Freedom+of+Religion

//Lemon v. Kurtzman// This case involved the state funding (by PA and RI) of church-related schools (like York Catholic). This funding, according to the S.Court violated the first amendment clause which states that gov't cannot advance or decline any religion.

//Everson v. Board of Education// Facts of the Case A New Jersey law allowed reimbursements of money to parents who sent their children to school on buses operated by the public transportation system. Children who attended Catholic schools also qualified for this transportation subsidy. Question Did the New Jersey statute violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment as made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment? Conclusion No. A divided Court held that the law did not violate the Constitution. After detailing the history and importance of the Establishment Clause, Justice Black argued that services like bussing and police and fire protection for parochial schools are "separate and so indisputably marked off from the religious function" that for the state to provide them would not violate the First Amendment. The law did not pay money to parochial schools, nor did it support them directly in anyway. It was simply a law enacted as a "general program" to assist parents of all religions with getting their children to school. The Oyez Project, Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), available at:  (last visited Monday, January 14, 2008).